On April 5th, 2013 at approximately 13:30 I was doing plumbing work on one of my rental properties for my tenant and I saw two unmarked police vehicles approaching my rental property as I was entering my rental unit on XXXX W 81 between Madison ave and Lorain rd. The police had barged into unit unannounced without a warrant. I was coming up the stairs from the basement and heard “Where did that guy go?” My tenant pointed the police towards the basement. They asked my tenant what my name was and my tenant told him. The police met me at the top of the stairwell going into the kitchen from the basement. The police asked me my name and I asked the police officer if I was being detained? They swore at me and said I was giving them an attitude. They put me in handcuffs in the kitchen and led me out of the house on the side porch. I asked the police if they had reasonable suspicion that a crime occurred. They said they did and showed me a picture of a white male that was allegedly breaking into houses into the neighborhood. I proceeded to give the police my information. I told the police they were a violent criminal organization, they had a monopoly of force and if they were a private company they would go out of business.
The main supervisor, a Sergeant, ironically had the Badge# 666 with a NYPD hat on. The second had the badge #672 (I believe). The third cop who was a detective called me a piece of shit because I expressed my distaste for law enforcement and told them that I don’t respect their profession because they violate people’s rights on a daily basis. The detective who didn’t have a badge number visible said I was a “Sovereign Citizen” and I was a threat to Homeland Security. I told them if there was ever an armed revolt in this country I would be on the front lines fighting with the people against them. They ran my information and let me go. This is another example of police officers having a “We can do whatever the fuck we want.” thug mentality. There needs to be more oversight over law enforcement and unelected government bureaucrats so they can be held accountable for their actions.
Friday, April 5, 2013
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Punched In Face by Police Officer for Asking His Name
I wanted to report an incident that happened to me on w 81st and Lawn Ave near Madison Ave on June 13th at approximately 16:30. I was driving south on west 81 st when I was stopped by an unmarked police car as I was passing Lawn ave. As the plaincloths police officer Robert Miles (Badge #2046 Unit 111 1st District) approached my vehicle I asked him why he stopped me (which is a logical question) and he said I ran through the stop siign and that I was being smart with him and he started swaring at me. I asked him what his name was and he told me to get out the vehicle. When I got out of the vehicle he ordered me to turn around and face the car. He then placed me in handcuffs. I then asked his partner (Name and Badge# Unknown) what his name was because he was also in plaincloths and had no visible ID and he told me to shut the fuck up and punched me in the face! The two officers led me to the back of the police car. As I was walking to the police car I told them I didn't consent to any searches and they searched my vehicle without a warrent. I sat in the police car for about 15 to 20 minutes while they ran my information. During this time, in a nutshell I told them they were out line and were violating my civil liberties. When the information checked out they wrote me a ticket for running a stop sign and sent me on my way.
There seems to be an arrogance among police officers and government bureaucrats in general that they can do whatever they want with no accountability. After all their salary is paid by tax dollars so they get paid regardless if I am satisfied with their services or not. I have several witnesses and I will do everything in my power to make sure these police officers and the city face criminal and/or civil charges to the fullest extent so this type of behavior doesn't happen again. Is it acceptable for a police officer to punch me in the face for simply asking for his name and identification? What would happen if I punched a police officer in the face for asking my name? Judges and prosecutors never hold police officers to the same standard of justice as citizens; this has to change.
There seems to be an arrogance among police officers and government bureaucrats in general that they can do whatever they want with no accountability. After all their salary is paid by tax dollars so they get paid regardless if I am satisfied with their services or not. I have several witnesses and I will do everything in my power to make sure these police officers and the city face criminal and/or civil charges to the fullest extent so this type of behavior doesn't happen again. Is it acceptable for a police officer to punch me in the face for simply asking for his name and identification? What would happen if I punched a police officer in the face for asking my name? Judges and prosecutors never hold police officers to the same standard of justice as citizens; this has to change.
Monday, May 31, 2010
Child Support is Modern Day Slavery!
1) Child support reform in needed in Ohio. Child Support and Alimony are immoral and are examples of modern day slavery in today's society and violate the 13th amendment of the United States Constitution. No matter how noble the cause, it is wrong to steal money from one individual and give it to another.
2) If a child support system does exist, it should be fair. There are no provisions in Ohio law that take into account how much time the noncustodial parent is spending with their child. For example, if one parent has 50-50 shared parenting there are obviously costs that will be incurred from raising a child (Food, Clothing, School Supplies, Child Care Costs (the cost of staying home to watch your kid), Diapers Etc.) So Shouldn't a noncustodial parent that has shared parenting pay less child support than a noncustodial parent that doesn't invest any time or money into his/her children other than child support? There are numerous states that have provisions that take into account how many overnights per week a child spends at the noncustodial parents residence and adjust the child support accordingly. The current system punishes noncustodial parents for being involved in their kids lives because any money that the noncustodial parents spends on their children is considered "gift money."
3) Child Support should be based on actual costs of raising children not a fabricated percentage based on the noncustodial parent's gross income or potential income (imputed income.) Why are some children entitled to $50/month and other children entitled to $2000/month? With no cap on how much a custodial parent could collect, child support could theoretically be $20,000 a month or more. There should be a legal limit on how much child support a custodial parent can collect. If child support money received by the custodial parent is in excess of the actual costs of raising children then child support is in effect alimony.
4) If child Support is based on income is should be based on net income not gross income. With a progressive income tax combined with a child support schedule based on gross income the noncustodial parent will actually take home less than he would if child support was based on net income. In most states it's based on net income.
5) If a noncustodial parent has a high paying job his child support is immediately increased. But as soon as the noncustodial parent loses his/her job and becomes unemployed he needs to pay money and petition the court to lower the child support. With the limited resources of CSEA and juvenile courts, getting child support lowered can take as long as 6 months or more. During this time, the noncustodial parent has an arreage accruing, is being charged interest and penalties, has driving and professional licenses suspended (making it even more difficult to find a job and pay child support), etc. This makes it difficult for the noncustodial parent to even survive in this bad economy.
6) No one should go to prison for not paying child support. Every parent has a moral duty to take care of their kids, but it is not the responsibility of government to legislate morality.
7) Child Support is another example of the overinvolvement of government in our lives today. Whenever the government get's involved they do more harm than good.
I am encouraging you and other legislators to have the courage to stand up to radical feminists that devised this unfair child support system and introduce a bill that levels out the playing field between the custodial and noncustodial parent
2) If a child support system does exist, it should be fair. There are no provisions in Ohio law that take into account how much time the noncustodial parent is spending with their child. For example, if one parent has 50-50 shared parenting there are obviously costs that will be incurred from raising a child (Food, Clothing, School Supplies, Child Care Costs (the cost of staying home to watch your kid), Diapers Etc.) So Shouldn't a noncustodial parent that has shared parenting pay less child support than a noncustodial parent that doesn't invest any time or money into his/her children other than child support? There are numerous states that have provisions that take into account how many overnights per week a child spends at the noncustodial parents residence and adjust the child support accordingly. The current system punishes noncustodial parents for being involved in their kids lives because any money that the noncustodial parents spends on their children is considered "gift money."
3) Child Support should be based on actual costs of raising children not a fabricated percentage based on the noncustodial parent's gross income or potential income (imputed income.) Why are some children entitled to $50/month and other children entitled to $2000/month? With no cap on how much a custodial parent could collect, child support could theoretically be $20,000 a month or more. There should be a legal limit on how much child support a custodial parent can collect. If child support money received by the custodial parent is in excess of the actual costs of raising children then child support is in effect alimony.
4) If child Support is based on income is should be based on net income not gross income. With a progressive income tax combined with a child support schedule based on gross income the noncustodial parent will actually take home less than he would if child support was based on net income. In most states it's based on net income.
5) If a noncustodial parent has a high paying job his child support is immediately increased. But as soon as the noncustodial parent loses his/her job and becomes unemployed he needs to pay money and petition the court to lower the child support. With the limited resources of CSEA and juvenile courts, getting child support lowered can take as long as 6 months or more. During this time, the noncustodial parent has an arreage accruing, is being charged interest and penalties, has driving and professional licenses suspended (making it even more difficult to find a job and pay child support), etc. This makes it difficult for the noncustodial parent to even survive in this bad economy.
6) No one should go to prison for not paying child support. Every parent has a moral duty to take care of their kids, but it is not the responsibility of government to legislate morality.
7) Child Support is another example of the overinvolvement of government in our lives today. Whenever the government get's involved they do more harm than good.
I am encouraging you and other legislators to have the courage to stand up to radical feminists that devised this unfair child support system and introduce a bill that levels out the playing field between the custodial and noncustodial parent
Saturday, May 8, 2010
Why All Police Are Bad People
When is the last time you saw a police officer stop or prevent a crime? How many times in your lifetime can you remember a police officer protecting you? Have you ever benefited from police services? How many times have you been prosecuted for trivial victimless crimes such as speeding tickets, expired tags, or drug possession?
You have to understand that law is not based on morality and is just someone’s idea being signed into law. Unfortunately, many people’s morality is based on what the government does. When people send money to the IRS it is under the threat of force but still most people don’t consider it stealing. Many of these laws are immoral and are designed to generate revenue for the state. For every new law that is passed the state has more power over your lives. Think about how many DEA and BATFE agents would be out jobs if we eliminated all drug laws and laws regulating firearms.
Now that we established that there are many laws that are immoral, we have to analyze the actions of the people that carry out these laws, the police officers’ sense of morality, and how it destroys peoples’ lives in the process. Are they just doing their job? Or are they just as guilty as the people that make these immoral laws. I think they are guiltier because they are the initiators of force against people just trying to live their lives. Their mere presence deprives us of a certain amount of liberty. To make it worse, most people have no problem with the fact that your are not even allowed to resist them.
Government police have a monopoly of power and the corruption in our society stems from the fact that the police, the prosecutors, the judges, and all other city officials are all on the same team and work for the same people. They don’t have to respond to market forces such as providing good customer service. They are parasites on society and you are the host.
In my opinion if a law enforcement officer or any other government official initiates force against someone for simply exercising their rights, they have a right to resist and use whatever force necessary to defend themselves. The primary purpose of the second amendment is to give citizens the means of protecting themselves from armed government officials; not protecting themselves from private criminals. Who is more of a threat to you?
You have to understand that law is not based on morality and is just someone’s idea being signed into law. Unfortunately, many people’s morality is based on what the government does. When people send money to the IRS it is under the threat of force but still most people don’t consider it stealing. Many of these laws are immoral and are designed to generate revenue for the state. For every new law that is passed the state has more power over your lives. Think about how many DEA and BATFE agents would be out jobs if we eliminated all drug laws and laws regulating firearms.
Now that we established that there are many laws that are immoral, we have to analyze the actions of the people that carry out these laws, the police officers’ sense of morality, and how it destroys peoples’ lives in the process. Are they just doing their job? Or are they just as guilty as the people that make these immoral laws. I think they are guiltier because they are the initiators of force against people just trying to live their lives. Their mere presence deprives us of a certain amount of liberty. To make it worse, most people have no problem with the fact that your are not even allowed to resist them.
Government police have a monopoly of power and the corruption in our society stems from the fact that the police, the prosecutors, the judges, and all other city officials are all on the same team and work for the same people. They don’t have to respond to market forces such as providing good customer service. They are parasites on society and you are the host.
In my opinion if a law enforcement officer or any other government official initiates force against someone for simply exercising their rights, they have a right to resist and use whatever force necessary to defend themselves. The primary purpose of the second amendment is to give citizens the means of protecting themselves from armed government officials; not protecting themselves from private criminals. Who is more of a threat to you?
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Video of Cleveland Heights Gestopo Police Ordering Citizien to Ground for Open Carrying
Cell Phone Video of Gestapo NAZI Cleveland Heights Police Officer Theodis Porter (Unit# 1761) and Officers Falisa Berry (Investigator with 16 years experience with Cleveland Heights Police Department) and Officer Hood (Unit #1169) Terrorizing their Citizens for simply exercising their rights on 07/04/09 at approximately 1730. In the end they let me go with no charges filed and returned my gun.
For people that don't know, the carrying of firearms openly (unconcealed) is a legal activity in Ohio and does NOT require a permit. Unfortunately, the officers of the Cleveland Heights Police Department did not know the laws they were hired to enforce.
The case was settled for an undisclosed amount provided they institute an educational policy training their law enforcement officials on Ohio Firearm laws (including ORC 9.68.) I wish I could have taken the case all the way to the Supreme Court and make case law, but I did not have the financial resources to do so. I would like to thank the 3 people that donated to my case.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQPoBxqas-M
For people that don't know, the carrying of firearms openly (unconcealed) is a legal activity in Ohio and does NOT require a permit. Unfortunately, the officers of the Cleveland Heights Police Department did not know the laws they were hired to enforce.
The case was settled for an undisclosed amount provided they institute an educational policy training their law enforcement officials on Ohio Firearm laws (including ORC 9.68.) I wish I could have taken the case all the way to the Supreme Court and make case law, but I did not have the financial resources to do so. I would like to thank the 3 people that donated to my case.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQPoBxqas-M
Video of me being Kicked Out of University Circle Starbucks in Cleveland for Open Carrying
I voted today and part of my activism I decided to open carry into starbucks. It should be noted that this was a corporate owned restaurant and there was no sign on the door prohibiting open carry and starbucks corporate released a statement allowing open carry in their restaurants.
Their contact information is:
11302 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland - (216) 229-0749
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36_SYoI9-mw
Their contact information is:
11302 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland - (216) 229-0749
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36_SYoI9-mw
Welcome!
The purpose of this blog is to allow people to discuss freedom related issues and to say things that would be moderated in other forums. So anything goes here! Some of the topics discussed in this blog may include but are not limited to:
- The Carrying of Firearms Openly or Concealed (Experiences)
- Gun Control
- Abortion
- Illegal Immigration
- Police Brutality
- Statism / Welfarism / Socialism / Communism
- Libertarianism / Minarchy/Anarchy
- Child Support Laws/Custody
- Liberialism/Neoconservatism
- Drug War/Prostitution
- Foreign Policy
- Monitary Policy
- States Rights
- Political Candidates
- and ANYTHING ELSE!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)